Mental Health First Aid Training Nyc Course Review
- Enquiry article
- Open Access
- Published:
Mental health first aid training in a workplace setting: A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN13249129]
BMC Psychiatry book 4, Article number:23 (2004) Cite this article
Abstract
Background
The Mental Wellness First Aid training grade was favorably evaluated in an uncontrolled trial in 2002 showing improvements in participants' mental health literacy, including knowledge, stigmatizing attitudes, confidence and help provided to others. This article reports the first randomized controlled trial of this course.
Methods
Data are reported on 301 participants randomized to either participate immediately in a class or to be wait-listed for 5 months earlier undertaking the training. The participants were employees in two large authorities departments in Canberra, Australia, where the courses were conducted during participants' work fourth dimension. Data were analyzed co-ordinate to an intention-to-treat arroyo.
Results
The trial plant a number of benefits from this training course, including greater confidence in providing help to others, greater likelihood of advising people to seek professional help, improved concordance with wellness professionals about treatments, and decreased stigmatizing attitudes. An additional unexpected but exciting finding was an comeback in the mental health of the participants themselves.
Conclusions
The Mental Health Kickoff Aid training has shown itself to be not only an effective manner to improve participants' mental health literacy but too to improve their own mental health. Information technology is a course that has high applicability across the community.
Peer Review reports
Groundwork
In 2000 we adult a Mental Health Commencement Aid grade in response to the findings of 2 big national mental wellness surveys in Australia [one, 2]. These findings included a high prevalence rate of mental wellness problems (approximately 20% of adults in any 1 year), the poor mental health literacy of members of the Australian public (poor recognition and knowledge of symptoms and causes of mental health problems, where to seek assistance and what are the about effective treatments) and the widespread stigma towards people with mental health problems. Regular kickoff aid courses are recognised as improving the public'due south giving of initial and advisable assistance at medical emergencies but, unfortunately, most of these courses do not include mental health problems.
The Mental Health Outset Assistance course consists of three weekly sessions of three hours each. The content covers helping people in mental health crises and/or in the early on stages of mental wellness problems. The crunch situations covered included suicidal thoughts and behavior, astute stress reaction, panic attacks and acute psychotic beliefs. The mental health problems discussed included depressive, anxiety and psychotic disorders. The co-morbidity with substance utilize disorders is also covered. Participants learn the symptoms of these disorders, possible risk factors, where and how to get help and evidence-based effective help.
The initial evaluation trial of the Mental Health Commencement Aid course was an uncontrolled ane with 210 members of the public with pre, postal service and 6-calendar month follow-upwards. This trial showed that participants improved: their recognition of mental disorders, their beliefs about what treatments were helpful, attitudes towards people with mental disease, the amount of help provided to people with mental health issues, and their confidence in providing assistance to these people [iii].
The next stride in our evaluation of this class was to conduct a randomised trial involving a look-list control grouping. The present article reports this written report, which was carried out in a workplace setting.
Methods
Participants
Eligible participants (approximately 4800) were all Canberra-based employees of two Australian regime departments: Health and Ageing, and Family unit and Community Services. The trial was advertised to staff by email. Participants had to agree to be randomly assigned to receive the training in either Month 1 or Month six. Training was delivered and information collected at the worksite during office hours.
Interventions
The form content has been described in the Background and previously [3] and further details can be found at the Mental Health Beginning Help website [4]. The training followed set lesson plans and all participants were given a Mental Health First Aid Manual to go on [5]. Training was administered at the worksite in classes of 6–eighteen participants. Participants did not necessarily stay in the same class, just moved between classes to complete the grade as necessitated by their work schedule. One teacher carried out all the training. She is the developer of the Mental Health First Aid grade and had trained over 1000 people before the start of the trial. Participants received training either immediately (June) or afterward a five-calendar month delay (November). Those who received training immediately constituted the intervention group and the wait-listed grouping was the control. To monitor whether the intervention was actually received, an attendance curlicue was kept for each class.
Objectives
The main objective was to appraise whether Mental Wellness Showtime Assistance grooming improved mental health literacy and helping skills relative to a await-list control. A secondary objective was to assess whatsoever benefits to the participants' own mental health.
Outcomes
Outcomes were measured in the month before intervention (the pre-test assessment) and in the 5th calendar month later on intervention (the follow-up cess). The intervention group received preparation in Month 1 (immediately after pre-examination) and the expect-list control group received training in Month 6 (immediately after the follow-up).
All outcomes were measured by self-completed questionnaires based on the ones used in the uncontrolled trial of Mental Wellness First Assist [three]. The pre-test questionnaire (run into Additional File 1) covered the following: socio-demographic characteristics of the participant, why they were interested in doing the course, history of mental health issues in participant or family, confidence in providing help, contact with people who accept mental health problems in previous 6 months and assistance offered, recognition of a disorder in vignettes describing a person with depression and ane with schizophrenia, belief about the helpfulness of diverse interventions for the persons described, a social distance scale to assess stigmatizing attitudes [7], and whether the participant or a family unit member or friend had ever had a trouble like the one in the vignette.
To score the items on beliefs about treatment, a scale was created showing the extent to which participants agreed with health professionals about which interventions would exist useful. For depression, at that place is a professional person consensus that GPs, psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, antidepressants, counseling and cognitive-behavior therapy are helpful [6]. Thus, participants received a score from 0 to 6 co-ordinate to the number of these interventions endorsed as helpful and this was converted into a per centum. For schizophrenia, at that place is a professional consensus that GPs, psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, antipsychotics and admission to a ward are helpful for schizophrenia [6]. "Helpful" ratings were summed to requite a score from 0 to 5 and converted to a per centum.
The questionnaire concluded with the SF-12, which provided scales assessing the participant's mental and physical health [viii]. These scales were scored using Andrews' [9] integer scorer.
The follow-upwards questionnaire was the aforementioned every bit the pre-test questionnaire except that it omitted the sociodemographic questions and asked nigh contact with anyone with a mental health problem over the 5 months since the last questionnaire (rather than 6 months).
The questionnaires were sent out via internal departmental mail past a human resource staff fellow member in each place of employment. The questionnaires were completed anonymously with only an ID number and posted dorsum to the researchers at the Middle for Mental Health Research. The IDs of any not-responders were sent back to the human resource staff member who sent out a reminder. The researchers were never told the names of individual respondents and the human being resources staff fellow member in the identify of employment never saw whatsoever completed questionnaires or individually identifiable data.
Sample size
The study was planned to take a sample of 300. The sample size was determined past practical constraints: when it was convenient to run classes that fitted the employees' work schedule and the workload on the instructor. Information technology was determined that this sample size had excellent power to detect medium effect sizes for both continuous and dichotomous outcomes [10]. The trial was originally planned to involve merely one workplace, but was extended to a second ane because the number of participants recruited was smaller than expected. The lower recruitment appeared to exist due to the requirement that participants agree to random consignment to preparation at either of 2 periods.
Randomization and blinding
A staff member in the human resources section of the place of employment kept a list of participants' names and ID numbers. The researchers but had access to the IDs. Ane of the researchers (Jorm) randomly assigned participants to training or command groups past ID number using the Random Integers option at the http://random.org website [11]. Later recruitment, participants were assigned an ID by the staff member in homo resources. These staff assigned participants to groups based on the randomized IDs provided to them. Random resource allotment occurred only after all participants within a place of employment were recruited and assigned ID numbers. The instructor (Kitchener) provided the human being resource staff member with the names of attendees to check that participation was as allocated. Blinding was not possible with the Mental Health First Assistance intervention.
Ethics
Ethical approval for the study was given by the Australian National University Human Inquiry Ethics Committee.
Statistical methods
Repeated measures assay of variance was used to analyze continuous measures, with two groups (intervention and control) and two time points (pre-examination and follow-up). The principal interest was in the group × time interaction effect. Logistic regression was used to clarify alter in dichotomous measures, with group and pre-exam score as the predictors and follow-up score every bit the outcome. Place of employment was as well investigated to run across if there was a difference in the effects of training. Nonetheless, no interaction effects involving place of employment were found, so this variable was dropped from all analyses reported below.
The analysis was carried out according to intention-to-treat principles, so that all persons who completed a pre-examination questionnaire were included, even if they subsequently dropped out. In such cases, the pre-test score was substituted for the missing value, so that no improvement was assumed.
Results
Recruitment
An email inviting participation was sent to all staff of the relevant departments based in Canberra. The electronic mail was sent out in May 2002 for the Department of Health and Ageing and March 2003 for the Department of Family unit and Customs Services. In society to participate, staff had to send back a consent form and fill out a pre-exam questionnaire before the start of classes.
Participant flow
Figure 1 shows the flow of participants at each stage of the trial. There were 2 deviations from plan. Firstly, xviii of the 146 participants (12.3%) assigned to receive Mental Health First Assist training did not complete the whole form. Secondly, 39 out of 146 participants (26.7%) in the intervention group did not complete follow-upwards questionnaires, compared to just 22 out of 155 (xiv.2%) in the command group.
Catamenia diagram showing progress through the phases of the trial.
Participants' characteristics
In terms of sociodemographic characteristics, 78.ane% of the participants were female, 49.ii% were aged 18–39 years, 50.2% were aged 40–59 and 0.vii% aged 60+ years. There were 60.6% with a university degree, ane.3% were ancient and viii.vi% did not have English language as their first language. 13.0% described themselves as mental wellness consumers, 9.half dozen% as carers for a person with a mental health problem, and 6.3% as health service providers. When asked their reason for doing the course, 27.2% cited reasons relating to their workplace, 11.7% reasons relating to family or close friends, four.9% reasons relating to their ain mental health status, 20.v% cited duty as a citizen, 29% said they were just interested, and 6.7% wanted more accurate or updated information on mental health. 165 (54.viii%) of the participants worked at the Department of Health and Ageing and 136 (45.2%) at the Department of Family unit and Community Services.
Numbers analyzed
The data were analyzed co-ordinate to intention-to-treat principles, so that all persons who completed a pre-test questionnaire were included, even if they subsequently dropped out. For every assay, there were 146 participants analyzed in the intervention group and 155 in the control group.
Perception of mental health problem in self or family
Participants were asked about whether they themselves had ever experienced a mental health problem or whether anyone in their family had. Tabular array ane shows that around one-half reported having personally experienced a mental health trouble and around three-quarters reported that a family member had a mental wellness problem. All the same, participating in the Mental Wellness First Aid course did not affect these variables.
Recognition of disorder in vignette
Table ii shows the per centum who correctly recognized the disorders in the vignettes. For the schizophrenia vignette, mention of either "schizophrenia" or "psychosis" was considered correct. The table also shows the percent who got both vignettes correct. Although there tended to exist greater improvement in recognition in the grouping receiving Mental Wellness First Aid, there were no significant differences from the control group.
Beliefs about treatments
Table iii shows the data on whether beliefs virtually treatments became more concordant with those of wellness professionals. There was significantly greater improvement in concordance in the Mental Health Commencement Aid grouping when both low and schizophrenia were considered together. However, the trends failed to accomplish significance at the .05 level when the disorders were considered separately.
Social distance
Tabular array 3 shows data on social distance from the person in each vignette. In that location was greater improvement in social altitude in the Mental Wellness First Aid group overall, but when the two vignettes were examined separately, this comeback was bars to the depression vignette.
Aid provided to others
Table 4 shows data on conviction in providing assist and actual help provided to others in the period before completing the questionnaire. Confidence improved more in the Mental Health Beginning Assistance grouping. There was no change in the pct who reported contact with anyone with a mental wellness trouble or in the percentage reporting giving "some" or "a lot" of help. However, while the control group showed a decline in the percentage advising professional help, the Mental Wellness Offset Aid grouping did not, leading to a meaning difference betwixt groups.
Participants' mental wellness
Table 5 shows changes in the mental and physical health of participants. The Mental Wellness Offset Aid group showed significantly greater comeback in mental wellness. No difference between groups was establish in physical wellness, but none was expected. The physical wellness calibration is included in the table only to show the specificity of the consequence on mental health.
Adverse events
Given that an educational intervention was evaluated with a not-clinical sample, at that place was no justification for a systematic inquiry into adverse events. Informally, no adverse events were reported.
Give-and-take
This trial has found a number of benefits from Mental Health Offset Aid grooming. Relative to the control group, the intervention group showed greater confidence in providing help to others, greater likelihood of advising people to seek professional help, improved concordance with health professionals in beliefs almost treatment, decreased social distance from people suffering from low, and improved mental wellness of the participants themselves. Recognition of disorders in vignettes did not improve, but there was a very loftier recognition at pre-exam, limiting the scope for improvement.
A potential criticism of Mental Health Get-go Aid grooming is that it will lead to excessive labeling of life problems as mental disorders by members of the public. To check this possibility nosotros asked participants most mental health problems in themselves and family members. Although a high prevalence charge per unit was reported, we found that the form had no issue on these rates.
A surprising consequence was that the course improved the participants' scores on the SF-12 mental wellness scale. We included this calibration to explore whether at that place was any bear upon on mental health, but did not accept whatsoever strong expectation that it would. The course is not aimed at the participants' own mental wellness and does non include whatever therapy. Furthermore, but v% of participants cited their own mental wellness as a reason for doing the course. All the same, the participants' mean score on the mental health scale was around half a standard deviation below Australian population norms [nine], showing that some were having on-going problems. The cause of the improvement in mental health is non clear. It is unlikely to be a placebo effect because the course gave no expectation of personal change in mental health and only a pocket-sized percentage did the course for their own do good. Furthermore, there was no corresponding change on the SF-12 physical wellness calibration. We speculate that the evidence-based information given in the course allowed participants to take action to do good their own mental wellness. A like therapeutic effect has recently been reported from a trial of a web site giving evidence-based information on depression [12].
The data assay involved a conservative intention-to-treat strategy in which participants who failed to complete the whole course were included and those who failed to respond to the follow-upward questionnaire were causeless to show no change. A particular limitation in the present study is that participants in the intervention grouping showed a poorer response to the follow-upwards questionnaire than controls. The reason for this poorer response is unknown, but nosotros believe information technology occurred because the intervention group had already received the course and had nothing to gain by filling out a further questionnaire. Past dissimilarity, the controls were still waiting to receive their preparation and may have believed that filling out the questionnaire would assist this. Whatever the reason, the poorer response in the intervention group meant that more than of them were assumed to bear witness no change, thus minimizing whatever benefits of the preparation. It is likely that the truthful effects of Mental Health Beginning Aid training are greater than the nowadays data signal.
The present trial evaluates efficacy rather than effectiveness. The trial was carried out in a workplace setting with well-educated employees who were allowed to practise the course during working hours. There was merely i teacher, who was the programmer of the Mental Health First Aid form, limiting the generalizability of the findings to other instructors. Further research is needed to evaluate the class as taught by other instructors in more typical settings. We are currently engaged in an effectiveness trial with members of the public in a large rural expanse, with local health service staff trained to run the courses.
The Mental Health First Assist training evaluated in this trial was ix hours long. Based on feedback from participants that the form needed to exist longer, we at present routinely run the grade over 12 hours. This longer course expands on each of the topics covered, especially substance use disorders. Whether this longer course has additional benefits remains to be evaluated. Notwithstanding, our expectation is that it would produce greater effects on beliefs almost treatment, confidence in providing assistance and actual aid to provided to others.
Conclusions
Mental Health First Aid training appears to be effective in improving some aspects of mental health literacy, confidence in providing help to others, and the type of help provided. The training also benefits the mental wellness of participants. The form is highly acceptable in a workplace setting and could be widely practical. Over 100 Mental Health Kickoff Aid instructors accept now been trained and the course is bachelor throughout much of Commonwealth of australia and in Scotland, Hong Kong and New York Land, USA. Dissemination in other localities is planned in the near future.
References
-
Andrews G, Hall Westward, Teeson M, Henderson South: The Mental Health of Australians. Canberra: Mental Health Branch, Commonwealth Department of Wellness and Anile Care. 1999
-
Jorm AF, Korten AE, Jacomb PA, Christensen H, Rodgers B, Pollitt P: "Mental wellness literacy": a survey of the public's power to recognise mental disorders and their behavior most the effectiveness of treatment. Med J Aust. 1997, 166: 182-186.
-
Kitchener BA, Jorm AF: Mental wellness get-go aid preparation for the public: evaluation of effects on noesis, attitudes and helping behavior. BMC Psychiatry. 2002, 2: ten-10.1186/1471-244X-ii-10.
-
Mental Health Start Help Website. [http://www.mhfa.com.au]
-
Kitchener BA, Jorm AF: Mental Health Showtime Aid Manual. 2002, Canberra: Centre for Mental Health Research
-
Jorm AF, Korten AE, Jacomb PA, Rodgers R, Pollitt P, Christensen H, Henderson South: Helpfulness of interventions for mental disorders: beliefs of health professionals compared with the general public. Br J Psychiatry. 1997, 171: 233-237.
-
Link BG, Phelan JC, Bresnahan M, Stueve A, Pescosolido BA: Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance. Am J Public Wellness. 1999, 89: 1328-1333.
-
Ware JE, Kosinsk M, Keller SD: A 12-item brusk-course health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996, 34: 220-233. 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
-
Andrews Grand: A brief integer scorer for the SF-12: validity of the cursory scorer in Australian customs and clinic settings. Aust N Z J Public Wellness. 2002, 26: 508-510.
-
Cohen J: A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992, 112: 155-159. 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
-
Random.org Website. [http://www.random.org/]
-
Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Jorm AF: Delivering depression interventions using the internet: positive results from a large randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2004, 328: 265-x.1136/bmj.37945.566632.EE.
Pre-publication history
-
The pre-publication history for this newspaper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/four/23/prepub
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Kelly Blewitt for assistance with the organization of the trial and Claire Kelly for information entry. We likewise wish to thank the staff of the Department of Wellness and Ageing and the Department of Family and Community Services for their assistance with recruitment, data drove and class arrangement, in item Christine Scicluna, Jaime Castles, Deborah Sydenham, and Hannah Gillespie.
Author information
Affiliations
Respective author
Boosted information
Competing interests
The authors were the developers of the Mental Health First Aid course.
Authors' contributions
BAK co-designed the report and the evaluation questionnaire, taught the Mental Health First Aid courses, and co-wrote the manuscript.
AFJ co-designed the report and the evaluation questionnaire, analyzed the data, and co-wrote the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Electronic supplementary material
Authors' original submitted files for images
Rights and permissions
Almost this article
Cite this commodity
Kitchener, B.A., Jorm, A.F. Mental health first aid training in a workplace setting: A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN13249129]. BMC Psychiatry 4, 23 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-4-23
-
Received:
-
Accepted:
-
Published:
-
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-4-23
Keywords
- Mental Health
- Schizophrenia
- Mental Wellness Problem
- Social Distance
- Mental Health Literacy
Source: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-244X-4-23
0 Response to "Mental Health First Aid Training Nyc Course Review"
Post a Comment